Confidential NDA/RFP file transmitted by Little Creek Farm LLC.... Please examine the enclosed content. [External]   ¶ permalink 0 comments

  Organization turned on its head ! How do we organize things ? The standard way of doing so is to group them into "similar buckets" so that finding them is easier. So all music goes in the Music folder. If I have a sudden urge of listening to 'mere sapnon ki rani', I go to the Music folder and then in the Kishore Kumar folder and then look for the song I want to play.In short it was the indexed way of thinking. One places and hence looks for later, similarly metadataed entities. The cost ? Takes time and effort. Every time I get a new document I have to place it in the right "bucket" so that I can find it easily later following the indexed trail. If I forget or I am lazy to do that, even though it is there somewhere in my digital realm, its lost to me for ever, as I can't find it later. The shortcomings ? The indexed method outlined above, is only half useful. The method only indexes file names, not the content inside them. Why is this even more relevant today ? We are deluged in content, tens of hundred of emails a day, news feeds, documents, online magazines ..Information glut is not only a reality, its fast becoming a problem. The new way! Do away with the heirachical structure, make one folder in your drive, call it Everything :). Place everything you have in that folder. No spending time on organizing and reorganizing your folder etc. Due to super fast searches which have already indexed your entire drive you dont need to drill down to the correct bucket to find the thing that you are looking for, the search itself will give you the file that you are looking for. I think this is a big paradigm shift in thinking about organizing documents. Dump your file structure and your indexed way of thinking ! Whatever you want just search for it . Ofcourse Gmail and Google desktop are both steps in that direction. Now if only someone could invent a way to have a search button inside a book, I would never have to go back and look for what the butler was doing in the second chapter when I am reading the last chapter of the detective novel, when the detective is explaining why the butler is the killer. I would just do a search on the butler ! (with ideas from m)  ¶ permalink 3 comments

  Get your Cricket .. When I look at the baseball "crazzies" around me in the US, yes I am talking about the manic Red Sox fans ( here and the movie Fever Pitch ) and others, I only look at them with an air of "how could they be so crazy to spend all that energy and time on what is essentially some middle aged men getting very rich being watched jumping and playing ? ". I did goto Fenway Park, here at Boston and although the atmosphere was great, it was still excessively slow and a boring, moronic way to spend an evening.However, I forget, in a time not long ago when I was in India, I was equally obsessed with a sport which has been called while being compared to Baseball, "Baseball on Valium" ( Robin Williams) and "Baseball has the great advantage over cricket of being sooner ended" (Shaw). So ofcourse its a "I grew up with the sport" thing, "once I know more of the sport, I know more of the strategies and the sport become more cerebral"...So I can cut the baseball freaks some slack.

Getting to the point however, it is very difficult to get any cricket here in the US. But I want my cricket. What to do ? What are the ways really ? In a similar way, as in our society, relative success is measured by your mode of transportation , so are the different ways of accessing cricket. There is the walking method, the Bajaj-Chetak method, the Maruti method and the Mercedes method.

first : The walking method. "F5" ( the refresh button ) is your friend, push it till your finger hurts a.k.a online cricket portals : Rediff, cricinfo.com, cricketnext.com and several others offer live scores on their websites in a text form. Some of them offer ball to ball commentary. Best of all, like walking, its free !

second: The Bajaj-Chetak method. Cricinfo has the live audio ball to ball commentary feed for the matches. It costs just about 6 bucks for the 5 India-SA matches for example. I subscribed to it while the second match was going on. It reminds you of the old Doordarshan-i style commentators, indeed if my ears can be trusted the Doordarshan specialist-I-do-all-sports commentator Anupam Ghulati was one of the commentators. Not the exquisite Richie Benaud or even the always interesting Harsha Bhogle level , but good enough.
But.. you really want to see the flourish of the bat, the swing of the ball.

third : The Maruti method :Wisden in conjuction with CricInfo( ? ), gives a service with which you can watch the live video on your computer.
But if you want the full deal, not just grainy pictures on your computer screen..

fourth : The Mercedes method : Use the satellites : ... DirectTV or Dish. Both of them offer various packages for a particular series, which are expensive but are the most obvious and best way if you already have the satellite channels. Lots of people buy the package and pool in with their friends to share the costs.

In addition there are a couple of superb blogs which track all the goings on in the Indian cricket world. Rediff's resident cricket expert, the superbly practical, cut-to-the-chase type Prem Paniker's Blog , Sight Screen and the vastly knowledgable, indomitable, King of Funda ( Swear to God, he know every possible "effect" or "law" that ever existed ) Amit Varma's creation on cricinfo : WicketToWicket.
And.. irrespective of wether I obsess about a slower sport, Baseball still sucks..

Update : I have heard that there might be a fifth cycle method : There is free audio commentary here but the commentary is bad.  ¶ permalink 5 comments

  Web 2.0'ing IM. Web 2.0 is really taking off.
There are essentially two aspects to it.

The first one is to provide "hooks" to developers which allow then to essentially access the information that they can get on the sites pages programmatically.
Amazon, Yahoo, Google, Salesforce.com all provide "webservices" which are to put it simply an interface into their applications. So, for example you could implement your own "Google" search in your application, build your own Yahoo maps application and show prices in Amazon of whatever books take your fancy in your own webpage.

The second one is to "webify" client applications. With the sudden frenzied resurrection of AJAX helping making the user experience more client like and some very clever and heavy coding in Javascript, smart and patient( ever tried debugging in javascript ? ) developers have with a vengence freed one application after another from the bastions of the desktop.
Consider the advantages, not tied to any operating system, no per client installation issues and no security issues, no version clash issues and ofcourse uinversal access.
Early successes include the email, with Oddpost and to a certain extent Gmail. ( The new Yahoo mail beta which uses oddpost technology indiacate a step in the same direction. ). Kiko for calender and scheduling, Zimbra for collaboration, Netvibes for personal dashboard are other noteworthy mentions.

IM is the latest stronghold of the client to fall. Have a look at Meebo. Meebo allows a user to login to any of the four most popular IM clients from a webpage and allows them to chat all on a webpage ! No client installation required at all. Very cool !

cross posted on the technology blog  ¶ permalink 2 comments

  An ode to Mithun-Da Mithun Rocks .. See here :   ¶ permalink 0 comments

  Google Talk Confirming to persistent rumours, Google has finally released Google Talk. The main punch line is : "Talk and IM with your friends for free".

Google has in my opinion, continously redefined well establised communication paradigms on the web. Cases in point,

• Search : Ofcourse, where it all started from.
• Email : Much higher storage space, tagging and conversations.
• Mapping : Panning and satellite photographs.
• Desktop Search : First to integrate with web search and now increased functionality with sidebar.
  
  So I set out to test this product with a lot of excitement especially in what innovative features Google would have added in this well known form of communication and made us wonder, WOW ! they could actually do this over the web ? However on testing it in a word, I was disappointed.

First what does it do : It is a standard IM in which you can add users and then IM/talk to them while they are online.

The good's :

• The best part is that it has the Google mark of a scrubby clean interface and simplicity. It does confirm to Google's "Dont make me think" style of UI design.
• It feeds in to your contacts from your gmail account so you can directly send invitations from there itself.
• The voice quality is very good.
• The claims are that it is sufficiently adherent to well known open source standards in IM in particular to the Jabber/XMPP protocol. Read more here.

The bad's/disappointments :

• The biggest disappointment is that it did not like Trillian allow us to migrate other IM lists in our list and we have to go about building a new list all over again. What a pain ! It does say that there is no "Service Choice" feaure in VOIP/IM where like a phone service you can communicate with users of other providers. How does Trillian do it then ?
• No new innovative features that I could see. VOIP based talk is long available from Skype and now in Yahoo messenger.
• No smileys, no avatars, no winks, no music, no games, audibles and this is a biggie NO webcam nothing.

Do leave in your comments.

  ¶ permalink 4 comments

  Cool Software   ¶ permalink 2 comments